When it comes to the topic of abiogenesis, I am neither a denier nor a cheerleader. That is, I don’t deny the earth spawned life and argue it is so improbable that it did not occur. I don’t think we know enough to make such negative claims. But neither do I buy into the notion that abiogenesis research has been making great progress over the years and solutions are right around the corner. I’ve heard that unfulfilled promise for too long now not be to be jaded. Personally, I think scientists are about as baffled about the origin as life as they were in 1953. What does this all mean? I don’t know.
Nevertheless, periodically you will come across cheerleaders who will hold up this study or that study as something that is supposed to be ground-breaking or as something that demonstrates the progress that is being made. My response is not to criticize, but to withhold judgment and wait to see if anything comes out of this study or that study. So I’ve been doing a lot of waiting. Anyway, if you don’t have the expertise to judge such claims, simply step back and survey the big picture. Go back to 1953 and again contrast a known field of scientific success (akin to using a positive control) with abiogenesis research over the years.
Since both dramatic findings were laid in the lap of the scientific community at the same time, it would be instructive to compare their respective track records of success.
An easy way to compare them is to take advantage of the fact that 2003 was the 50th anniversary of both papers, as human beings love to celebrate milestones.