- ad alu bacteria biology book brain Bunny Fright Week cats cells cilia circuits complexity convergence cytosine deamination deep homology design DNA engineering eukarya evidence evo-devo evolution FLE abstracts FLE ruminations front-loading front-loading ruminations genes genetic code genome HGT horizontal gene transfer humor Insp. Bunny intellectual honesty introns James Shapiro just for fun LECA life LUCA machines metaphysics metazoa moonlighting music nanotechnology nervous system neutral evolution nudge OOL organelles origin of life outline perception preadaptation proteins rabbit rationality Reply to Dave's Amazon review ribosome RNA science scientism Scott Turner seeding SETI SRP symbiosis Symmetry synthetic life terraforming transposons
March 2017 S M T W T F S « Feb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Francois Savard on Conceptual Links Between Respi… Michael on Ten Signs of Intellectual… Penelope on Ten Signs of Intellectual… Intellectual Honesty… on Ten Signs of Intellectual… fabulousfifius on Ten Signs of Intellectual…
- Book pictures
- Bunny Fright Week
- cytosine deamination
- deep homology
- FLE abstracts
- FLE ruminations
- genetic code
- horizontal gene transfer
- Insp. Bunny
- intellectual honesty
- James Shapiro
- just for fun
- needless complexity
- nervous system
- neutral evolution
- origin of life
- Scott Turner
- synthetic life
Category Archives: humo(u)r
A major short-coming of Intelligent Design Theory has been its reluctance to identify the designer. This study addresses this problem and firmly establishes the reality of Intelligent Design.
Most design theorists are uncomfortable talking about the designer. Wedgiecentric analysis has demonstrated this reluctance to be part of a sinister plot to foist a theocracy on an unsuspecting, scientifically-illiterate, Bush-electing public. If intelligent design is to be recognized for the science that it is, it must eschew this deception and show the scientific community the designer.
It has been proven that the bacterial flageller was designed. It is so complex that it must have been designed. It’s not just complex; it’s really, really complex. Think of the most complex thing you can think of. Well, the bacterial flageller is way more complex than that. Ergo, it could not possibly have come together in a tornado, so it just had to be designed.
Since designers must be in the vicinity of their designs, I hypothesized that a simple survey of flagerated bacterium would turn up the designer, sooner or later. I decided to look through 1 x 10^150 bacterial colonies in the hope of detecting the designer.
The following is a re-enactment of the study I completed.
The investigator looked at 3 plates/day for 120 days in the hope of seeing the designer. Since each plate contained approximately 300 colonies, a total of 1.08 x 10^5 colonies were looked at. No positive colonies were scored. Discouraged by the idea of screening through another 145 plates, a minor adjustment in the methodology was made (see Methods).
After appropriate set up, the investigator began to sense the designer was near late one night when no one was in the lab. The investigator quickly secured plate #112 with bacteria (Figure 1).
The investigator heard a faint sound coming from plate. A closer look at the plate showed nothing unusual (Figure 2).
The plate was returned to the bench when the sound was heard again. This time, the investigator took the plate and put it under a dissecting scope (Figure 3). As can be seen from the re-enactment, a faint blue dot was seen on one of the colonies.
At this point, the investigator pulled out the special designer-detecting instrument and used it to enhance the image of the scope. Something clearly was on the colony (Figure 4), but the image was oddly blurred, as if the designer was trying to hide.
The investigator then took his two hands, rubbed his eyes three times, waited precisely 12 seconds, and looked again. This time, the designer was identified as clearly seen in the re-enactment shown in Figure 5.