- ad alu bacteria biology book brain Bunny Fright Week cats cells cilia circuits complexity convergence cytosine deamination deep homology design DNA engineering eukarya evidence evo-devo evolution FLE abstracts FLE ruminations front-loading front-loading ruminations genes genetic code genome HGT horizontal gene transfer humor Insp. Bunny intellectual honesty introns James Shapiro just for fun LECA life LUCA machines metaphysics metazoa moonlighting music nanotechnology nervous system neutral evolution nudge OOL organelles origin of life outline perception preadaptation proteins rabbit rationality Reply to Dave's Amazon review ribosome RNA science scientism Scott Turner seeding SETI SRP symbiosis Symmetry synthetic life terraforming transposons
Recent Comments
Mikael Krauze on Nervous system in the car… Amber Louise Hillman on Ten Signs of Intellectual… Bilbo on Nick Lane Lecture g on Evolutionary Thought Experimen… Krauze on 10 signs of Intellectual … Categories
- ad
- alu
- bacteria
- biology
- book
- Book pictures
- brain
- Bunny Fright Week
- cats
- cells
- cilia
- circuits
- convergence
- cytosine deamination
- deep homology
- design
- DNA
- engineering
- eukarya
- evidence
- evo-devo
- evolution
- FLE abstracts
- FLE ruminations
- front-loading
- genes
- genetic code
- genomes
- horizontal gene transfer
- humo(u)r
- humor
- Insp. Bunny
- intellectual honesty
- introns
- James Shapiro
- just for fun
- life
- LUCA
- machines
- metaphysics
- metazoa
- moonlighting
- music
- nanotechnology
- needless complexity
- nervous system
- neutral evolution
- nudge
- organelles
- origin of life
- outline
- perception
- preadaptation
- proteins
- rabbit
- rationality
- ribosome
- RNA
- science
- scientism
- Scott Turner
- seeding
- SETI
- SRP
- symbiosis
- Symmetry
- synthetic life
- terraforming
- transposons
- Uncategorized
Meta
Daily Archives: April 26, 2009
Strict Gradualism
Earlier, I quoted from Eugene Koonin’s recent paper, “Darwinian evolution in the light of genomics” (Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, 1–24), as he outlines two of the excerpts from the principal concepts of the Modern Synthesis:
Evolution proceeds by fixation of the rare beneficial variations and elimination of deleterious variations: this is the process of natural selection that, along with random variation, is the principal driving force of evolution according to Darwin and the Modern Synthesis. Natural selection which is, obviously, akin to and inspired by the ‘invisible hand’ (of the market) that ruled economy according to Adam Smith, was the first mechanism of evolution ever proposed that was simple, plausible, and did not require any mysterious innate trends. As such, this was Darwin’s second key insight. The founders of population genetics, in particular, Sewall Wright, emphasized that chance could play a substantial role in the fixation of changes during evolution not only in their emergence, via the phenomenon of genetic drift that entails random fixation of neutral or even deleterious changes. Population-genetic theory indicates that drift is particularly important in small populations that go through bottlenecks (6,16). However, the Modern Synthesis, in its ‘hardened’ form (13), effectively, rejected drift as an important evolutionary force, and adhered to a purely adaptationist model of evolution.
And
The beneficial changes that are fixed by natural selection are ‘infinitesimally’ small, so that evolution proceeds via the gradual accumulation of these tiny modifications. Darwin insisted on strict gradualism as an essential staple of his theory: ‘Natural selection can act only by the preservation and accumulation of infinitesimally small inherited modifications, each profitable to the preserved being . . . If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.’ [(1), chapter 6]. Even some contemporaries of Darwin believed that was an unnecessary stricture on the theory. In particular, the early objections of Thomas Huxley are well known: even before the publication of the Origin Huxley wrote to Darwin ‘‘You have loaded yourself with an unnecessary difficulty in adopting Natura non facit saltum so unreservedly’”
I then asked two questions.
Why did Darwin insist on “strict gradualism as an essential staple of his theory”?
Why did most proponents of the Modern synthesis “reject drift as an important evolutionary force, and adhered to a purely adaptationist model of evolution”?
Let me take a stab at these questions.