Origin of Eukarya: Follow the Clues

As you know, I have been inquiring about the missing prokaryotic mice. Essentially, why is it that evolution has been unable to use the bacterial cell plan to spawn an organism as structurally and behaviorally complex as a mouse? Let me remind you of two lessons derived from pondering the missing mouse.

First, since natural selection is a designer-mimic (the blind watchmaker), then, like all designers, it is limited by the material it is using to express its design. This should not be all that controversial to accept. For example, everyone would agree that natural selection is limited by the laws of physics. No problem there. But we can go further and ponder to what degree natural selection is limited by the raw material which composes life itself. This is a key point for teleologists to ponder, as a limitation is a constraint, and a constraint can be used by a designer as a form of guidance.

So here’s where the missing prokaryotic mice come in, as it would seem natural selection has run into the wall of constraint. The bacterial cell plan, with its remarkable ability to laterally exchange information, engage in cell-cell communication, and metabolically adapt to an immense range of environmental conditions, has been an astounding success when it comes to colonizing and terraforming. But when it comes to evolving something akin to a mouse, it has never come close.

The missing prokaryotic mice is even more strange when you consider the ubiquity of convergent evolution. Simon Conway Morris has gathered a mountain of evidence outlining the manner in which convergence permeates the evolutionary tree. In fact, this is one area of his thinking that Richard Dawkins applauds. Why? Because ubiquitous convergence helps to move natural selection closer to a law-like phenomenon. (a status lost with the loss of strict gradualism). But if natural selection is law-like, as seen from the ubiquitous nature of convergence, the lack of convergence between bacteria and eukaryotes is even more striking – we can find nice examples of convergence between bacteria and fungi, we don’t see much between bacteria and animals.

So the missing prokaryotic mice boil down to a huge lacuna in the landscape of convergence. And I propose this is explained, ultimately, by the fact that designers are limited by their design material – the bacterial cell plan cannot be tweaked and tinkered with to generate something like a mouse. And this leads us to the second lesson (as I briefly outlined before).

If the bacterial cell plan, so good at colonizing and terraforming, is insufficient for making something like a mouse, then in order to make something like a mouse, the cell plan first needs to be radically re-tooled. From the front-loading perspective, this means the origin of the eukaryotic cell must have been front-loaded by features of bacterial cell design.

Let’s then begin the process of investigating for clues that would help us assess this prediction.

Advertisements

6 responses to “Origin of Eukarya: Follow the Clues

  1. All right, I’ll follow you down this rabbit hole, but you so better have your rooms done, and this so better lead to IFT.

  2. Unless of course prokaryotes “devolved” from eukaryotes:

    Can evolution make things less complicated?

    HT Mike Gene from Telic Thoughts…

  3. Fascinating article, Joe.

  4. Bilbo,

    I am pretty sure MG posted the article on TT in 2006.

    It struck a chord with me because I understand that evolution does not equal progess- whatever survives, survives.

    However evolutionists cannot have a eukaryote-first world-> enter Lynn Margulis…

  5. All right, I’ll follow you down this rabbit hole, but you so better have your rooms done, and this so better lead to IFT.

    Remodeling is on hold for this month because the government took a big chunk of my savings on April 15th. It’s feels great to be in this situation knowing that some of my money is helping to pay government bureaucrats six figure salaries to they can surf for porn all day at work.

    But yes, I’ll eventually steer into the land of IFT.

  6. Unless of course prokaryotes “devolved” from eukaryotes

    Yes, there isn’t a solid consensus on the origin of Eukarya.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s