How to Nudge Human Evolution

Some time ago, I noted that a key human feature, the opposable thumb, might be nudged into existence simply with the emergence of the pentadactyl limb and the appearance of trees. In fact, there is evidence to support the idea that the origin of our bipedalism occurred while our genetic ancestors lived among the trees.

Now there is a new study to suggest that this bipedalism was a preadaptation:

More than three million years ago, the ancestors of modern humans were still spending a considerable amount of their lives in trees, but something new was happening.

David Raichlen, an assistant professor in the University of Arizona School of Anthropology, and his colleagues at the University at Albany and City University of New York’s Lehman College have developed new experimental evidence indicating that these early hominins were walking with a human-like striding gait as long as 3.6 million years ago.


“Based on previous analyses of the skeletons of Australopithecus afarensis, we expected that the Laetoli footprints would resemble those of someone walking with a bent knee, bent hip gait typical of chimpanzees, and not the striding gait normally used by modern humans,” Raichlen said. “But to our surprise, the Laetoli footprints fall completely within the range of normal human footprints.”

The fossil footprints at Laetoli preserve a remarkably even depth at the toe and heel, just like those of modern humans. “This more human-like form of walking is incredibly energetically efficient, suggesting that reduced energy costs were very important in the evolution of bipedalism prior to the origins of our own genus, Homo,” Raichlen said.

If the Laetoli footprints were made by Lucy’s species, as most scientists agree to be the case, these experimental results have interesting implications for the timing of evolutionary events.

“What is fascinating about this study is that it suggests that, at a time when our ancestors had an anatomy well-suited to spending a significant amount of time in the trees, they had already developed a highly efficient, modern human-like mode of bipedalism,” said Adam Gordon.

It would seem to me that once a body had acquired the opposable thumb and human-like bipedalism, these would serve to nudge the emergence of a human-like brain that could fully exploit the architecture of the body.  Simon Conway Morris speaks of the high likelihood of the evolutionary emergence of intelligence (a view shared by SETI advocates) and points to crows and dolphins as examples of the independent evolution of such a trait.  However, given that crows and dolphins do not have the best body plan to fully facilitate the emergence of intelligence, this might explain why they have not reached the same level of intelligence as we see in humans.

6 responses to “How to Nudge Human Evolution

  1. Funny study-

    The foot-prints are “too old” to be that of a modern human therefor “Lucy” made the tracks by altering her gait.

    See also:

    Laetoli Footprints Fully Modern Too Early

    And as for opposable digits- just look at the chameleon.

    But anyway- what I would like to know is if there is any genetic basis for the switch to knuckle-walking to upright bipedal motion.

    IOW how can we test the premise that knuckle-walkers “evolved” into fully upright bipeds…

  2. Joe,

    Are you a creationist?

  3. Mike,

    No- that is if you mean that I follow the Bible.

    I’m not even religious.

    Last week my 7 year old asked me what “religion” is.

    I did my best to splain it to her. She has never been to church but knows they exist.

    But anyway I like to think that I follow the evidence and data.

    And actually I think the earth was colonized by some civilization that left a dying planet- or that just left for whatever reason.

    I limit myself to proximate causes- that is life on Earth.

    Dawkins may be right that the life that seeeded us/ designed us may have evolved but we can’t say because we cannot study it.

    But we can study what is here.

    So now I am looking for how to test the premise of universal common descent- well not now- I have been doing that since I was an evolutionist some 3+ decades ago.

    Ya see it was during that time- as an evolutionist- that I started having my doubts about the transformations.

    We knew about mutations causing problems. But nothing about mutations actually building stuff.

    And now here I am.

    A man without religion who seeks the reality behind our existence.

    There can be only one (reality that is)….

  4. Oh and I try to keep an open mind- meaning I do not reject what people say just because of who they are- creationist or evolutionist- atheist or christian or muslim or hindu….

  5. Alternative responses:


    Are you a creationist?

    No, I’m a vegetarian!


    Are you a creationist?

    Dat be fightin’ werds!

    But anyway….

  6. So people who question universal common descent are creationists.

    IMHO people who accept universal common descent are imaginationists.

    They can imagine how such a scenario unfolded.

    Rod Serling narrates the imaginative making it sound convincing-

    “Imagine if you will, everything needed to produce the diversity of life gathered on one planet. A planet we now call Earth”

    And those who accept universal common descent via an accumulation of genetic accidents – the modern synthesis- are cartoonists.

    Life is just a cartoon in which just about anything is possible given enough time, a little matter and some energy thrown in.

    Father Time + Mother Nature + Magical Mystery Mutations = the diversity of life

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s