Daily Archives: March 22, 2010


Earlier, I just pointed out that if life and/or evolution was designed, science could not detect it. It is the clear implication of the limitations of science we have discussed.  Now, if you bristled at that conclusion and find yourself in disagreement, it is probably because you subscribe, consciously or subconsciously, to scientism.

So what is scientism?

Continue reading

The Implication

I have now spent some time nailing down what seems clear to me – without independent evidence of the designers, science has no method to determine whether or not something was designed, explaining why it is that the concept of purpose or goals has no place in science.  Many will deny this.  But if you can see this, then it is time for the next step.

Continue reading