Methylation – Focusing the Effects of Cytosine Deamination

Back around 2002, I noted that the genetic code appears to funnel one of the most common  base pair substitutions, the C-to-T transitions caused by deamination of the cytosine.  Put simply, codons containing a C specified a wide range of amino acids, but when that C is converted to T, the new set of codons all converge on the most hydrophobic amino acids.  The original analysis is found here.

To see this for yourself, the figure below represents a hydrophobicity scale for the 20 amino acids based on 47 published attempts to quantify hydrophobicity:

aascale

Source

Now consider the effect of cytosine deamination using this scale:

aascale2

Scale on left are the amino acids coded for by C-containing codons which is converted to scale on right by the deamination of those cytosines.

But what if we did the same analysis, but this time restrict our focus to the cytosines that are followed by guanines – the CpG sequences discussed here, given that such sequence is the most likely to exploit the effects of deamination?

aascale3

Scale on left are the amino acids coded for by CG-containing codons which is converted to scale on right by the deamination of those cytosines.  Codons that all ended with C followed by a G ((–C)G) are excluded since all such base pair substitutions are silent.

Whoa.  The IHE effect has been tightened up.  Is this just a coincidental relationship?

Consider if we looked at the same changes using something known as the OMH scale.  As this paper explained (see Figure A.1C.3), “the OMH scale (Sweet and Eisenberg, 1983) is a measure of how likely a given amino acid will be replaced by a different hydrophobic or “buried” amino acid in a protein. In effect, this scale is how evolution views the hydrophobicity of an amino acid.”

aascale4

The green box shows the amino acids coded for by CG-containing codons which is converted to the set in the red box by the deamination of those cytosines.

Is this just a coincidental relationship?  Remember, as this paper notes, “Methylated cytosines can easily be converted to thymine residues via deamination and this mutational process has the highest rate among all base substitutions.”

About these ads

2 responses to “Methylation – Focusing the Effects of Cytosine Deamination

  1. Coincidences illusion is all they have…

    Long long time ago there was a coincidance occured, this was the Adam of all coincidences..and after the beginning from no where , atoms ping the universe and the universe coincidentally creates all the phenomena , if you wait long enough You can even solve raven paradox with coincidences ..because paradigm says so ..they will be everthing, they will create everything,they will even answer everyhing..

    We call this brian malfunction as ; hopeless materialistic disorder (HMD) that prevents understanding the inteligence behind nature.. and an unconcious state that imagine to represent scientific thinking..A kind of philosophy mutates itself with coincidences..

    Darwin logic – evolution :D its immune system based on philosophy not science..

    Good shot Sir, You hunted the Duck again..

  2. Pingback: The Top 10 of 2009 «

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s